Module 1 - Conceptualizing Disability (P.4 of 7)
|
Categorizing Disabilities Disabilities are categorized for many reasons; a primary reason is to establish protocols for the distribution of benefits and services. Categorizing disabilities helps the government identify needs and allocate necessary resources to various populations of people with similar disabilities. Without categorizing disabilities by diagnosis, third-party payers would not reimburse for services and the government would not provide services (agencies, residential institutions, specialized interventions) (Smart, 2000). In addition, these classifications provide a basis around which individuals with disabilities can organize their legal, social, and advocacy efforts. There are many different ways to classify disabilities, but no one way has been deemed the standard. The most general way to categorize disabilities is to categorize them into on of the following categories.
The most widely accepted disability categorization is by symptoms and manifestations, not cause or source (Smart, 2000). This categorization is more specific than that previously mentioned. It is also the means by which the government officially categorizes disabilities. In this system, disabilities fall into one of four broad categories.
For AT purposes, it is easier to categorize disabilities based on the function that the technology device will help improve. Categorizing disabilities this way guides those recommending AT as to what type of technology to pursue. These categories are as follows.
Although categorizing disabilities is necessary, it can have negative effects. Categorization can perpetuate generalizations, such as the idea that all people with the same disability share characteristics, experiences, and perceptions. Also, these categories tend to focus on the disability and not the strengths, abilities, and assets of the individual. Categorizing disabilities tends to put yet another label on an individual with a disability (Smart, 2000). |